New Movie: ‘Hellbound?’ (Updated)

New Movie: ‘Hellbound?’ (Updated)

Sep 26

……………………

……………………

……………………

‘HELLBOUND?’: MOVIE QUESTIONS HELL AS PLACE OF ETERNAL TORMENT
By Travis Loller
Huffington Post
September 19, 2012

Original Link

How can a loving God send people, even bad people, to a place of eternal torment? A new documentary struggles with questions of punishment and redemption and how culture affects and shapes Christian beliefs about God and the Bible.

Coming in the wake of controversy over Rob Bell’s 2011 hell-questioning book “Love Wins,” which put hell on the cover of Time magazine, and treading some of the same ground, filmmaker Kevin Miller believes the debate about the nature of hell is not academic.

In an interview after a Nashville screening of “Hellbound?” Miller said he believes our ideas about hell have a real-world effect on the way we live our lives and the way we relate to others.

Perhaps popular theologian Brian McLaren best expresses that thought in the movie when he says, “If I believe that a small percentage of human beings were created to enjoy bliss eternally and another group of beings were created to experience eternal conscious torment, then I look at human beings differently than if I say, `Every human being was made in the image of God. Every human being is beloved by God. God is at work to save every human being.’”

McLaren’s position is contrasted with that of Seattle megachurch pastor Mark Driscoll, who explains that, in his view, “God created the world and people chose to rebel against him. And God came and died to save some of them from the death they deserve.”

Mainstream Christianity, especially evangelical Christianity, tends to promote some version of that view, which includes the idea of hell as eternal torment.

Miller briefly mentions the view that those unsaved by Jesus will simply perish, called annihilationism. But the filmmaker seems to lean toward a view that holds out hope that hell exists but may not be eternal — that God wants to be reconciled to all people, and that the reconciliation can happen even after death.

Bell was called heretical by some critics for promoting a similar view in “Love Wins.”

In the film, Missouri’s International House of Prayer Director Mike Bickle says that to promote the idea that the grace of God is available in hell, or universalism, “is the worst crime that a preacher of the Gospel could say to the world.”

But Miller seeks to show that the view is not out of line with Christian tradition.

Catholic apologist Peter Kreeft says the Catholic church leaves the question somewhat open.

“That there is a hell and that anyone can go there by their free choice, that’s dogma,” he says. “That there’s anybody in it and how many people are in it, nobody knows.”

Orthodox Archbishop Lazar Puhalo emphatically asserts, “God doesn’t send anybody to hell. God doesn’t punish anybody, either in this world or the world to come.”

In his view, “hell is a condition, not a place. The malice we feel is the fire that burns.”

Miller bookends the film around the 9/11 tragedy, saying events like the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center are the reason people need to believe in hell as a place of punishment for bad people, like Osama bin Laden or Adolf Hitler.

But Christian author Brad Jersak reminds the audience that common Christian belief teaches that Hitler isn’t the only one going to hell.

“If we’re strict infernalists, the victims of Auschwitz who didn’t have their names written in the book of life go right from Hitler’s flames into God’s flames, forever and ever and ever,” he says.

Miller is from Canada, but his religious upbringing probably would be more common for an American. He calls himself a recovering fundamentalist, although he said has great respect for the “ladies who put their heart and soul” into teaching him about the Bible.

He grew up in the mainline United Church of Canada but joined the Mennonite church as teenager. He went to a Mennonite Bible college and spent some time in an interdenominational seminary. He attended several nondenominational evangelical churches before becoming an Anglican.

Miller said he considers himself a sophisticated reader of the Bible but never gave much thought to hell before he edited a book on the subject several years ago.

The controversy surrounding Bell’s “Love Wins” helped him frame the debate for the movie and some of the interview subjects are Bell’s most significant critics and supporters.

Miller says his film is primarily aimed at a religious audience.

“A growing number of people are increasingly uncomfortable with the notion of a God who calls us to love our enemies but who will one day vanquish his enemies to hell,” he said in an interview. “People sense the contradiction but think that the only way to resolve it is to leave Christianity.”

“Hellbound?” opens in New York City on Friday.

……………………

HELLBOUND?: THE MOVIE

Original Link

Hell. A shadowy abode choked with eggy, sulphurous fumes; the stench of blackened, bubbling flesh and screams of agony from souls trapped forever in a lake of fire, tortured by a worm that dieth not. A vision made all the more terrifying by the fact that God — the only being who could possibly save us from such a fate — is the one who consigns us there instead.

Such horrific depictions of hell have gripped humanity for centuries. And rightly so. Throughout history, people of all faiths have agonized over why God allows so much evil in the world. Their only comfort has been the hope that somehow, someday, God will make things right. Evildoers may get away with murder in this life. But in the life to come, there’ll be hell to pay.

But the traditional view of hell also presents us with a dilemma: Of course we all want to see the scales of justice balanced. But if God is our pure, all-loving Creator, can he really allow (presumably) billions of people to suffer in hell for eternity? Evil is evil, but doesn’t the traditional view of hell tip the scales too far the other way? To many people, it seems like we can have a good God or we can have the traditional view of hell, but we can’t have both…

While recent challenges to the traditional view are grabbing headlines, people have been grappling with this dilemma for centuries. Some simply resign themselves to the mystery, hoping the logic of damnation will be revealed in the life to come. Others suggest alternate views, such as Annihilationism (the souls of the damned are extinguished after the judgment of the dead), Universalism (everyone goes to heaven) and various positions in between. Still others become so frustrated that they finally walk away from Christianity altogether.

Is it possible we’ve gotten hell wrong? Or are recent challenges to the traditional view a vain attempt to avoid the inevitable? Hellbound? is a feature-length documentary that asks why we are so bound to the idea of hell and what our view of hell reveals about how we perceive God, the Bible and, ultimately, ourselves.

Coming to theaters September 2012.

……………………

RELATED LINKS:

Hellbound? Website
Hellbound? Blog
Wikipedia on Hell
NHNE NDE on Hellish and Distressing Near-Death Experiences
Dancing Past The Dark

……………………

3 comments

  1. Nicholas Kovalenko

    Not only has the human species gotten “hell” wrong, but Christians have got Rabbi bin Jesus of Nazareth all wrong and are not even close to comprehending the true nature and magnitude of what is called “God” or Allah.
    To think of God as an individual being is to be so simple-minded, ignorant and egocentric/ethnocentric it is almost beyond hope, and such a view proves that the person with such a view hasn’t experienced the slightest of legitimate, authentic spiritual enlightenment.

  2. Wow, Nicholas, you’re over the top with your comments. There are many, many authentic levels of spiritual experience, some of which involve experiencing God as a personal presence, others experiencing God directly (as the “I Am That I Am”), and all kinds of levels and experiences in between. Dismissing everyone who experiences God as an individual as “simple-minded, ignorant, and egocentric/ethnocentric” is, I’m afraid, a hurtful and uninformed thing to do. How did you come to believe such a thing?

  3. [I love this blog, BTW ...]

    I never used to believe in Hell until my life (and my country, as far as I’m concerned) went there in a hand-basket about 10 years ago. I’ve heard of people relating near death experiences depicting a Hellish existence, and after reading the Bible, I was surprised that Jesus did in fact speak of Hell many times.

    For example, He spoke about people being cast into an “outer darkness” where there would be “weeping and gnashing of teeth,” He cast out devils (remember the crazy guy that lived in a cave, and the demons, who recognized Jesus, asked to be cast into a herd of swine?), and He spoke of a place where the fire shall never be quenched: “And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched: ” [Mark 9:43]

    There’s the story of Lazarus the beggar and the rich man at whose gate he laid in Luke 16: “And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.”

    Then there’s the last line of Matthew 25: “And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous will go into eternal life.”

    … But the idea of *eternal* just seems way too much for me!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>